ArticleScientific reports2025
Essential oils of Lavandula angustifolia and Thymus vulgaris as biocontrol agents: managing Dactylopius opuntiae infestation and associated bacterial infections.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and Biological Control of Fungal Pathogens Associated with Cactus Pear Diseases in Morocco.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dactylopius opuntiae, the invasive cactus cochineal, is a major pest threatening Opuntia ficus-indica cultivation, especially in arid regions. This study assesses the insecticidal and antibacterial properties of essential oils (EOs) from Lavandula angustifolia (lavender) and Thymus vulgaris (thyme) as eco-friendly biocontrol agents. Laboratory (in vitro) and greenhouse (in vivo) tests were performed using emulsified EOs at 1%, 5%, and 10% concentrations. In vitro tests showed that lavender EO caused 95.0 ± 3.0% mortality in nymphs and adult females of D. opuntiae at 10% after 8 days, with an LT₅₀ of 3.0 days. Thyme EO was slightly less effective (90.0 ± 3.5%, LT₅₀ = 3.5 days). Greenhouse experiments indicated reduced but significant efficacy (85.5 ± 4.0% and 80.0 ± 4.5% mortality for lavender and thyme EOs at 10%, respectively). Disk diffusion and broth microdilution tests against Proteus penneri showed that thyme EO had stronger antibacterial activity (MIC = 0.625%, MBC = 1.25%) than lavender EO (MIC = 1.25%, MBC = 2.5%), both with bactericidal effects. These findings demonstrate the dual insecticidal and antibacterial potential of lavender and thyme EOs, supporting their inclusion in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. Further research is needed to evaluate their field persistence, effects on non-target organisms, and formulation stability for sustainable cactus pest control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.