Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41034244›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Screening autism spectrum disorder in children using machine learning on speech transcripts.

Rida Assaf, Zein Shehabeddine, Vikram Ramesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rida AssafDepartment of Computer Science, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. ra278@aub.edu.lb.
Zein ShehabeddineDepartment of Computer Science, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Vikram RameshDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

University Research Board, American University of Beirut 104518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in children is crucial for timely interventions that can improve developmental outcomes. Traditional diagnostic methods are often resource-intensive, time-consuming, and may raise ethical concerns regarding privacy, particularly for minors. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of privacy-preserving machine learning models for ASD detection using children's speech transcripts. By exclusively leveraging structured text-based inputs, our method inherently avoids the direct use of identifiable biometric data, such as raw audio or video, thus significantly reducing privacy risks. Although we have not implemented explicit cryptographic privacy measures (e.g., differential privacy, encryption), our approach minimizes privacy concerns inherently associated with sensitive biometric data. We conducted experiments on two datasets from the TalkBank repository, focusing on linguistic features such as Mean Length of Utterance (MLU) and Mean Length of Turn Ratio (MLT Ratio). Our results demonstrate strong predictive performance, with models achieving accuracy above 86% across both datasets. Notably, we found that a small, focused subset of features was sufficient to maintain this level of performance, reducing the need for extensive data collection, thereby enhancing privacy. These findings highlight the promise of computational linguistics in advancing non-invasive, ethical approaches to ASD detection, providing a foundation for future applications in clinical and educational contexts.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderMachine LearningSpeechChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleArtificial intelligenceAutism spectrum disorder (ASD)Computational linguisticsFeature importanceMachine learningPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID41034244
PMCPMC12489003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.