ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance evaluation of weak kaolin soils with waste-derived plastic granular inclusions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sustainable geotechnical solutions are increasingly adopting recycled materials for ground improvement. However, the use of vertically embedded Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) plastic waste columns, particularly with geotextile confinement, remains underexplored in existing literature, limiting their practical application. This study addresses that gap by evaluating the mechanical performance of kaolin clay reinforced with ABS columns of varying diameters and depths, both with and without geotextile encasement. The research aims to quantify strength improvements, identify optimal reinforcement configurations using geometric ratios, and develop a predictive regression model for practical use. Laboratory tests, including unconfined compression and unconsolidated undrained triaxial shear, showed that encapsulated ABS columns with 8 mm diameter and 50 mm depth enhanced unconfined compressive strength by up to 125.5% and increased effective cohesion from 22.0 to 70.9 kPa. Strength gains were primarily attributed to improved confinement and frictional resistance. A regression-based model was developed to estimate strength based on column geometry and placement parameters, aiding real-world applications. Additionally, incorporating recycled ABS plastic reduces landfill waste and offers a lower carbon footprint compared to conventional materials, reinforcing its potential as an effective and sustainable solution for soil stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.