ArticleNature communications2025
Resolving chemical-motif similarity with enhanced atomic structure representations for accurately predicting descriptors at metallic interfaces.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A local structural basis to distinguish amorphous ices.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Resolving chemical-motif similarity with enhanced atomic structure representations for accurately predicting descriptors at metallic interfaces.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately predicting catalytic descriptors with machine learning (ML) methods is significant to achieving accelerated catalyst design, where a unique representation of the atomic structure of each system is the key to developing a universal, efficient, and accurate ML model that is capable of tackling diverse degrees of complexity in heterogeneous catalysis scenarios. Herein, we integrate equivariant message-passing-enhanced atomic structure representation to resolve chemical-motif similarity in highly complex catalytic systems. Our developed equivariant graph neural network (equivGNN) model achieves mean absolute errors <0.09 eV for different descriptors at metallic interfaces, including complex adsorbates with more diverse adsorption motifs on ordered catalyst surfaces, adsorption motifs on highly disordered surfaces of high-entropy alloys, and the complex structures of supported nanoparticles. The prediction accuracy and easy implementation attained by our model across various systems demonstrate its robustness and potentially broad applicability, laying a reasonable basis for achieving accelerated catalyst design.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.