ArticleNature communications2025
Unifying machine learning and interpolation theory via interpolating neural networks.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Coupled machine learning-ecosystem ensemble models substantially improve predictions of nitrous oxide (NProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational science and engineering are shifting toward data-centric, optimization-based, and self-correcting solvers with artificial intelligence. This transition faces challenges such as low accuracy with sparse data, poor scalability, and high computational cost in complex system design. This work introduces Interpolating Neural Network (INN)-a network architecture blending interpolation theory and tensor decomposition. INN significantly reduces computational effort and memory requirements while maintaining high accuracy. Thus, it outperforms traditional partial differential equation (PDE) solvers, machine learning (ML) models, and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). It also efficiently handles sparse data and enables dynamic updates of nonlinear activation. Demonstrated in metal additive manufacturing, INN rapidly constructs an accurate surrogate model of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) heat transfer simulation. It achieves sub-10-micrometer resolution for a 10 mm path in under 15 minutes on a single GPU, which is 5-8 orders of magnitude faster than competing ML models. This offers a new perspective for addressing challenges in computational science and engineering.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.