ArticleNature communications2025
RNA-peptide interactions tune the ribozyme activity within coacervate microdroplet dispersions.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elucidating the Reciprocal Interplay between Supramolecular Polymer Cytoskeletons and Fuel-Dependent Synthetic Cells.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Spatially Encoded Protocell Network for Non-Cascaded Parallel Biocomputation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- DNA cross-over motifs-based, programmable supramolecular hydrogels for the mechanoregulatory effects of cellular behaviour and cytoskeleton reorganization.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Article
- The Borderlands of Foldability: Lessons from Simplified Proteins.Trends in chemistry · 2026Article
- Hydrogen-bonded complexes of glycyl-l-glutamate with nucleosides: a dft and qtaim study.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Complex and Messy Prebiotic Chemistry: Obstacles and Opportunities for an RNA World.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membrane-free complex coacervate microdroplets are compelling models for primitive compartmentalisation with the ability to form from biological molecules. However, understanding how molecular interactions can influence physicochemical properties and catalytic activity of membrane-free compartments is still in its infancy. This is important for defining the function of membrane-free compartments during the origin of life as well as in modern biology. Here, we use RNA-peptide coacervate microdroplets prepared with prebiotically relevant amino acids and a minimal hammerhead ribozyme. This is a model system to probe the relationship between coacervate composition, its properties and ribozyme activity. We show that ribozyme catalytic activity is inhibited within the coacervate compared to buffer solution, whilst variations in peptide sequence can modulate rates and yield of the ribozyme within the coacervate droplet by up to 15-fold. The apparent ribozyme rate constant is anti-correlated with its concentration and correlated to its diffusion coefficient within the coacervates. Our results provide a relationship between the physicochemical properties of the coacervate microenvironment and the catalytic activity of the ribozyme where membrane-free compartments could provide a selection pressure to drive molecular evolution on prebiotic earth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.