ArticleImmunology2026
Challenge Specific Modulation of Responses to Adjuvant-Induced Innate Immune Memory.
Article in Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trained immunity in respiratory diseases: Mechanisms of action and intervention strategies.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Challenge Specific Modulation of Responses to Adjuvant-Induced Innate Immune Memory.Immunology · 2026Article
- The role of immune cells-mediated memory in weight cycling, glucose disorders and insulin resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the innate immune memory induced by adjuvants provides an opportunity to improve vaccine efficacy by inducing nonspecific secondary responses alongside the intended adaptive defence against the target antigen. To understand the consequences of adjuvant-induced immune training, we treated mice with commercially available Sigma Adjuvant System (SAS) and performed functional assays of bone marrow-derived innate immune cells, assessed its functional consequences in vivo, determined the resulting haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) phenotypes, and extensively analyzed the HSPC transcriptome. SAS induced temporal shifts in HSPC frequencies, alterations in the circulating blood profile, and lowered proinflammatory output by macrophages. SAS-induced training caused disparate outcomes in models of inflammation and acute infection. Further, SAS enhanced antibody responses after primary immunisation, that were profoundly altered upon a secondary dose. Integrated transcriptional analysis revealed shifts in HSPCs defined by altered transcription factor activity and lineage-specific shifts in metabolic, epigenetic, myeloid, and kinase genes, resulting in enhanced antimicrobial neutrophil responsiveness and revealing regulators of central training. Together, these results contribute to the understanding of the plasticity and limitations of innate immune training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.