Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41034148›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2026

GPs' perspectives on patients presenting with endometriosis symptoms: an interview study.

Sólja Petersen, Ulrik Bak Kirk, Maria Pencheri, Sharon Dixon, Rebecca L Mawson, Birgitte Nørgaard, Michael Marcussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sólja PetersenDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8341-2568
Ulrik Bak KirkDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1683-2189
Maria PencheriDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5538-3390
Sharon DixonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7469-6093
Rebecca L MawsonDivision of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK r.l.mawson@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-6197
Birgitte NørgaardDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2284-2335
Michael MarcussenDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8376-912X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis affects about one in 10 women, yet diagnosis often takes 8-12 years after onset of symptoms. In the Faroe Islands, GPs play a key role in recognising symptoms, managing care, and coordinating referrals to specialists. Therefore, GPs' perspectives on how challenges to care arise and how care could be improved are crucial in order to develop effective interventions for change.

aimTo investigate how GPs in the Faroe Islands experience encounters with patients presenting with endometriosis symptoms. DESIGN &

settingA qualitative interview study was undertaken with six GPs from various practices across the Faroe Islands.

methodThis study conducted semi-structured individual interviews and analysed participants' responses. Systematic text condensation, inspired by Malterud's thematic analysis, was used to explore GPs' perspectives on their interactions with patients presenting with endometriosis symptoms.

resultsWithin the constraints of the Faroese healthcare system, many GPs reported difficulties collaborating with gynaecologists on treatment protocols. Limited referral pathways often led to challenges, particularly when referrals were declined or when patients were returned to general practice without clear diagnosis or management plans. GPs expressed frustration with the limited treatment options available in primary care and a sense of being professionally constrained. They emphasised the need for specialist involvement and highlighted the importance of building long-term relationships with patients offering holistic care, managing expectations early, and maintaining continuity of care.

conclusionThis study highlights the difficulties GPs face when managing and referring patients with suspected endometriosis. It is crucial to enhance collaboration with specialists and improve referral protocols to optimise patients' care and outcomes.

Indexed as

endometriosisgeneral practitionersprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID41034148
PMCPMC13540369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.