Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41034145›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2026

Strengthening integration of pathways into general practice in Australia: a virtual workshop study with stakeholders.

Faith Yong, Priya Martin, Sneha Kirubakaran, Katharine Ann Wallis, Riitta Partanen, Jordan Fox, Srinivas Kondalsamy Chennakesavan, Matthew McGrail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Faith YongRural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4878-7565
Priya MartinRural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2092-6551
Sneha KirubakaranRural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5412-1711
Katharine Ann WallisGeneral Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-9362
Riitta PartanenRural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Hervey Bay, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6768-3382
Jordan FoxRural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8367-5297
Srinivas Kondalsamy ChennakesavanRural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-374X
Matthew McGrailRural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia m.mcgrail@uq.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6901-8845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere remains an urgent need for more medical graduates choosing general practice to address expanding GP workforce shortages. Priority interventions remain unclear but strengthened integration of medical training pathways into general practice may help.

aimTo explore stakeholder views on ways to strengthen integration of pathways into general practice across the medical education and training pipeline. DESIGN &

settingParticipatory research virtual workshop. Participants were purposively sampled to include representation across the Australian medical education and GP training sector.

methodUsing a nominal group technique, participants were prompted to generate suggestions in activities that build on known factors, and to discuss proposed new and modified solutions to the GP shortage. Content analysis and synthesis supported iterative review of the categorisation framework until team consensus was reached.

resultsSeventeen participants (four workshops) made 145 suggestions, which were refined to 67 proposed interventions. There were three overarching categories: (1) improved equity in pay and status for GP trainees and specialists; (2) increased systemic exposure to general practice and generalism; and (3) clearer pathway options to general practice and generalism.

conclusionGeneral practice pathways could be strengthened by increased exposure to general practice working conditions and generalism philosophies, along with clearer transitions between different training stages. However, increased equity of resources and the status of general practice within medical specialties were also very important macro factors, beyond education and training alone. Thus, GP pathway interventions require reconfiguration supporting integration into the medical training system to actively value GP healthcare contributions.

Indexed as

education and standardsgeneral practicequalitative researchworkforceworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID41034145
PMCPMC13540371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.