ArticleJournal of trauma and injury2025
Estimated blood storage requirements for a North Korean invasion of South Korea and South Korea's preparedness.
Article in Journal of trauma and injury, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support.Medical review (2021) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable battlefield deaths, and up to 30% of casualties could survive with timely transfusions. In a potential North Korea-South Korea conflict, ensuring adequate blood supply would be crucial for military medical readiness. This study estimated the 2-week blood demand in such a conflict and evaluated South Korea's preparedness to meet it.
methodsA multifaceted approach was employed, incorporating historical casualty data, medical literature on battlefield transfusions, South Korean blood supply reports, and military blood logistics models. Projections indicate 80,000 to 150,000 casualties within the first 2 weeks, with 30% of military and 15% of civilian casualties requiring transfusions. The estimated total blood demand ranges from 360,000 to 600,000 L, surpassing current South Korean reserves.
resultsDespite a 100,000-L prewar storage goal, weekly replenishment needs could reach 150,000 to 300,000 L, placing immense strain on collection, storage, and distribution systems. Key shortages include packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets, with projected deficits of up to 120,000, 70,000, and 30,000 units, respectively. The logistical challenges of storing and transporting platelets, given their 5-day shelf life, make them particularly vulnerable to depletion. To address these shortages, a multipronged strategy is required, including pre-war stockpiling, mobile blood banks, rapid military-civilian coordination, international cooperation with US and other allies, and prioritization of whole blood over component therapy.
conclusionsSouth Korea's current blood reserves are insufficient for a large-scale war. A combination of strategic stockpiling, military-civilian coordination, and alternative blood sources (synthetic oxygen carriers, prewar autologous donation programs) is essential to sustaining medical operations and improving survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.