ArticleJournal of trauma and injury2025
Trauma eponyms (1837-1950): a comprehensive historical review.
Article in Journal of trauma and injury, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trauma eponyms reflect historical advancements in trauma medicine across various organ systems, often honoring pioneering physicians. These terms trace the evolution of medical understanding, particularly during wartime, though some have been replaced by more precise terminology. A comprehensive literature review was performed using the PubMed database to identify trauma-related eponyms described from 1837 to 1950. Supplementary biographical sources were also consulted. Eponyms were analyzed regarding their geographic distribution, affected organ systems, and ongoing clinical relevance, emphasizing connections to advancements in imaging, surgical procedures, and trauma care. A total of 30 trauma-related eponyms were identified, predominantly originating from France and Germany, highlighting the European leadership in medical research during the 19th and early 20th centuries. The pre-World War I period (1837-1914) emphasized anatomical and pathological observations, exemplified by eponyms such as Ollivier syndrome (1837), Curling ulcer (1842), and Klumpke paralysis (1885). The World Wars and subsequent postwar era (1914-1950) prompted significant innovations in battlefield medicine and surgical techniques, resulting in eponyms such as Tinel sign (1915), Bywaters syndrome (1941), and Fegeler syndrome (1949). While some eponyms have become obsolete, others remain clinically relevant due to clearly defined pathophysiological characteristics. Developments in imaging modalities (x-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography) and surgical methods have reinforced the contemporary relevance of these terms. Trauma-related eponyms provide a historical framework for understanding the evolution of trauma care. Their continued use highlights their diagnostic value and the enduring influence of historical medical discoveries on contemporary clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.