ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2025
Assessing the lateral fabellotibial suture technique with an assistant device for cranial cruciate ligament rupture: a cadaveric investigation of pressure mapping in small dogs.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the optimal stifle joint angle for the lateral fabellotibial suture (LFTS) technique in small dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR), by quantitatively assessing biomechanical parameters using pressure mapping and a 3D-printed tension assistant device. LFTS procedures were performed on 12 canine hindlimb cadaveric models divided into five groups: (1) Intact group, (2) cranial cruciate ligament-deficient (CCL) group, and (3-5) stifles fixed at 90°, 105°, and 135° (L90, L105, L135). Suture tension was quantitatively measured using a tensioner. Postoperative evaluations included pedobarography, tibial rotation angle, patellofemoral contact pressure, and femorotibial contact pressure, analyzed via force-sensitive resistors and pressure-sensitive films. Pressure mapping visualizations were used to evaluate joint mechanics and pressure distribution. Statistical analyzes were conducted using two-way ANOVA with post-hoc testing. The applied suture tension differed significantly among angle-fixed groups (P<0.05). Significant correlations were observed between experimental groups and pad pressure distribution (P<0.001). No significant difference in femorotibial contact pressure was noted between the L105 and intact groups. These results suggest that a stifle angle of 105° during LFTS most closely replicates normal joint contact mechanics, offering practical insights for optimizing tensioning protocols in small dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.