ArticleMicrobes and environments2025
Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota from Long-term Captive and Newly Captured Whale Sharks (Rhincodon typus).
Article in Microbes and environments, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite its ecological importance, the gut microbiota of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) remains poorly understood. Therefore, the present study exami-ned how environmental differences affect the fecal microbiota by comparing long-term captive and newly captured individuals. Fecal samples were collected over time from four long-term captive and two newly captured whale sharks, with seawater also being sampled from their respective tanks. Using 16S rRNA sequencing, 12,497 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified, including 6,976 classified as major ASVs. There were no significant differences in alpha diversity indexes between long-term captive and newly captured sharks; however, the latter showed slightly larger variance in four indexes. The ASV count per individual was slightly lower in long-term captive sharks than in their newly captured counterparts. In long-term captive individuals, Photobacterium was highly abundant. Conversely, Ureaplasma was dominant in newly captured individuals, but was barely detected in long-term captive sharks. Although alpha diversity did not differ significantly between the groups, a beta diversity ana-lysis showed clear distinctions. The high abundance of Ureaplasma in newly captured sharks suggests its involvement in nitrogen metabolism, possibly through urea recycling. Although further research is needed to clarify the taxonomic position and ecological functions of these Ureaplasma populations, the present study provides key insights for the conservation of wild whale sharks and improving health management for captive individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.