ArticleIndustrial health2026
Integrating disaster risk management into occupational health services: a framework for technological hazard resilience in high-risk industries.
Article in Industrial health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel conceptual framework that integrates Disaster Risk Management (DRM) into Occupational Health Services (OHS) to improve resilience against technological hazards in high-risk industrial sectors. Even though OHS is meant to safeguard the workplace, it lacks systematic management for disaster risks such as chemical spills, industrial fires and toxic releases. To address this gap, the proposed framework synthesizes two internationally recognized models: the WHO's Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (Health-EDRM) strategy and the Basic Occupational Health Services (BOHS) model. The integration is structured across three interconnected pillars: (1) Risk Governance and Policy Alignment, (2) Proactive Risk Assessment and Preparedness, and (3) Emergency Response and Resilience-Building. This approach extends the scope of OHS from traditional hazard control and compliance to proactive disaster resilience, offering a new theoretical and practical model tailored for vulnerable and complex industrial environments. In doing so, the framework supports Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by enhancing worker protection, business continuity and community-level sustainability. It also lays the foundation for future empirical research and offers actionable guidance for industry leaders and policymakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.