ReviewAnnals of medicine2025
Initial management and disposition of metastatic spinal cord compression in the emergency department: a review of the literature.
Review in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Higher Dose Irradiation for Malignant Spinal Cord Compression: Long-Term Results of the RAMSES-01 Trial.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Trial
- Long-Term Results of a Comparison Between 15 × 2.633 Gy and 20 × 2.0 Gy for Malignant Spinal Cord Compression in Patients with Longer Expected Survival Times.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long-Term Results of a Propensity Score Analysis Comparing 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy of Radiotherapy Alone for Malignant Spinal Cord Compression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Radiotherapy with 5 × 5 Gy for Personalized Treatment of Malignant Epidural Compression of the Myelon: Long-Term Results of the PRE-MODE Trial.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is a serious medical emergency that can complicate the course of various malignancies, including prostate, breast, and lung cancers. Appropriate evaluation and effective management of MSCC early in the emergency department are necessary to minimize neurologic deterioration and optimize the trajectory of patient recovery.
methodsThis literature review examines and summarizes current evidence surrounding the emergency department approach for timely recognition, initial evaluation, and management of MSCC.
resultsA comprehensive clinical history, nerve root or spinal cord clinical examination, and urgent imaging procedures are fundamental for early diagnosis and initial management. The urgency of intervention depends on the rate of onset of motor deficits, which can progress during work-up. Patients should be stratified into subgroups: those requiring immediate surgery, those who can be treated with radiotherapy, and those who may be discharged for outpatient care. Some patients can be observed for 24 h to adjust the medical and/or surgical treatment. In most cases, systemic steroid administration with dexamethasone should be started immediately upon diagnosis, followed by a tapering course of oral dexamethasone. Selected patients should undergo surgical decompression with or without stabilization. A multidisciplinary approach involving both spinal surgeons and radiation oncologists is essential for diagnosis and stratification.
conclusionFor patients with MSCC, early and effective evaluation and intervention in the emergency department, through a coordinated multidisciplinary effort, are vital to optimizing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.