Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41033797›Full record

Trial reportRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2026

Cryoanalgesia to treat phantom limb pain following a trans-femoral (above-knee) amputation: a randomized, sham-controlled pilot study.

Brian M Ilfeld, John J Finneran, Baharin Abdullah, Sabeeca Vadakkan, Rafael A Alkabalan, Rodney A Gabriel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06071715 (Cryoanalgesia to Treat Phantom Limb Pain Following a Trans-Femoral), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06071715 nacompletednot on this map

Cryoanalgesia to Treat Phantom Limb Pain Following a Trans-Femoral (Above-Knee) Amputation: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2024 to 2025Enrolled12ConditionsAmputation, Surgical, Amputation, Traumatic, Phantom Limb Pain, Phantom Pain Following Amputation of Lower LimbArmsACTIVE cryoneurolysis, SHAM cryoneurolysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian M IlfeldAnesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA bilfeld@health.ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6144-3273
John J FinneranAnesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0955-155X
Baharin AbdullahAnesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Sabeeca VadakkanSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Rafael A AlkabalanSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Rodney A GabrielAnesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4443-0021

Funding

San Diego Biomedical Informatics Education & Research (SABER)T15LM011271 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SHAMIM NEMATI · 2012 to 2026
$9.7M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM011271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA previous clinical trial applied percutaneous cryoneurolysis to lower limb amputees with phantom pain. The primary outcome measure was negative, but a secondary analysis suggested that patients with a below-knee amputation (BKA) improved, while the opposite was true for above-knee amputations (AKA). We theorized two potential reasons for this difference: cryoneurolysis was inadequate for the larger sciatic nerve in the upper thigh for AKA versus the lower thigh for BKA; and BKA is innervated by only two nerves, both of which were treated while AKA involved two additional nerves left untreated.

methodsParticipants with an existing AKA and intractable phantom pain had four nerves treated with ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis in the upper thigh: sciatic, femoral, obturator, lateral femoral cutaneous. For the larger nerves, we used an argon-based machine capable of inducing temperatures as low as -100°C and producing a relatively large ice ball. The sciatic nerve was treated both on the anterior and posterior aspects (5.5 min each). Participants were randomized to receive active or sham treatment with the option to return 4-6 months later for a crossover treatment. Participants and assessors were masked to treatment group allocation. Percutaneously inserted thermocouples were used to measure tissue temperature. Statistical analysis was not performed due to the limited sample size of this pilot study.

resultsAfter 1-month, average phantom limb pain intensity (primary outcome) was 5.0 (5.0, 6.0) in patients given cryoneurolysis (n=11) vs 5.0 (4.8, 5.3) for sham (n=5). Patients' Global Impression of Change and the Brief Pain Inventory (interference subscale) similarly suggested no improvement in either group after the initial post-treatment week. Tissue 3 mm from the cryoprobe required 2.5 min to reach -20°C and did not reach -40°C by the end of the freeze cycle.

conclusionsWe found no evidence that percutaneous cryoneurolysis of the four major nerves of the thigh with an argon-based machine improved lower extremity phantom pain 1 month following treatment. Due to the limited sample size and probable lack of therapeutically low temperatures across the entire sciatic nerve, these results should be viewed as preliminary and used to help guide future preclinical and clinical investigations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06071715.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalCryotherapyPhantom LimbAdultAgedFemaleFemoral NerveHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsSciatic NerveTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalAnalgesiaCHRONIC PAINCryoablationPain Management

Identifiers

PMID41033797
PMCPMC13151512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.