ArticleBMJ open2025
Investigation of prophylactic clip haemorrhage control for colorectal cold snare polypectomy in patients taking antithrombotic drugs (PERCOLD): study protocol-a multicentre prospective parallel-group non-inferiority RCT phase 3 trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe effect of prophylactic clipping for colorectal cold snare polypectomy (CSP) on delayed bleeding (DB) in patients with antithrombotic drugs remains unverified. The aim of the PERCOLD study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of DB rates in cases without prophylactic clips compared with cases with prophylactic clips in patients taking antithrombotic drugs for colorectal CSP through randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre prospective parallel-group RCT phase 3 trial that is being conducted at 14 institutions in Japan at the time of writing this manuscript. After providing consent, patients will undergo screening and assessment for study enrolment eligibility. Patients taking antithrombotic drugs (aged 20 years or older at the time of consent and who have agreed to participate in this study) will be selected if they have a preoperative suspected adenoma (including sessile serrated lesion) with an endoscopic diameter of <10 mm and an indication for CSP, provided they do not meet the exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint is the percentage of DB within 2 weeks after CSP per patient. DB is defined as haematochezia requiring endoscopic haemostasis. Secondary endpoints are rate of haematochesia within 2 weeks after CSP (per patient), rate of DB within 2 weeks after CSP (per polyp), percentage of performing endoscopy for haematochesia within 2 weeks after CSP (by patient and polyp), treatment time (from magnification of the first polyp to clip closure of the last polyp in the clip closure group and to observation after last polyp resection in the non-clip closure group) and complication rates (immediate bleeding, intraoperative perforation, delayed perforation and post polypectomy syndrome). The selected patients will be randomised 1:1 into the clip closure group and the non-clip closure group after registration, with 287 patients in each group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol has been approved by the Chiba University Certified Clinical Research Reviewer Board (CRB3180015), which serves as the central ethics committee, and registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials. The current protocol V.1.7, dated 4 October 2024. Written informed consent for participation in the study will be obtained from all participating patients. All participating institutions have formally agreed to conduct the study in accordance with this central approval, and local site permissions were obtained as required by each institution. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed journals and the key findings will be presented at international scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1032230086).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.