ArticleBMJ open2025
Incidence and drivers of medication returned to health facilities by patients in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMedication returned by patients to healthcare facilities is a critical aspect of reverse logistics, intersecting healthcare delivery, patient safety and environmental sustainability, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where systemic inefficiencies and socio-cultural factors may exacerbate the issue. While emerging medication return programmes are recognised for their potential to enhance resource efficiency and prevent misuse, they also signal inefficiencies in medical supply chains, prescribing practices and patient-provider interactions. This scoping review aims to systematically map the incidence and drivers of medication returned to health facilities by patients in LMICs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review follows Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework and the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Searches will be conducted in Google Scholar, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus, supplemented by grey literature sources and reference list screening. Searches will include studies from January 2005 to December 2025 and English-language publications, reflecting both the relevance of recent evidence and practical considerations for screening and analysis. Eligible studies must address the incidence or drivers of medication returned in LMICs and meet predefined inclusion criteria based on the Population, Concept, Context framework. Data will be extracted using a standardised charting form and analysed using narrative synthesis, supported by descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required as this scoping review will analyse publicly available literature. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences and healthcare organisations, with all data and search strategies made openly accessible through Springer Nature's protocols.io preprint repository to support transparency and future research. REGISTRATION: Springer Nature's protocols.io dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.3byl4wd5ovo5/v1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.