ArticleBMJ open2025
Association between green space exposure and elderly health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal urbanisation is intensifying alongside steadily expanding older adult populations. The resulting air pollution profoundly impacts human health by exacerbating diseases, particularly among vulnerable elderly groups. Evidence demonstrates that green spaces mitigate air pollutant effects on health. Recent studies indicate green space exposure benefits older adults physiologically, psychologically and socially. However, existing systematic reviews have not synthesised the health impacts on this demographic. Consequently, this protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate how green space exposure affects health outcomes in older adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy will be applied across: (1) electronic databases (eg, PubMed, Web of Science), (2) the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and (3) the Guidelines International Network database. Grey literature will be searched via GreyNet International, covering records from each database's inception to November 2024. The study will analyse associations between green space exposure and health outcomes in older adults. Two researchers will independently screen literature, extract data and assess risk of bias. Heterogeneity will be assessed with a focus on study design, exposure variables and outcome measures. If sufficient homogeneity exists, a meta-analysis will be undertaken; otherwise, a narrative synthesis will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study requires no ethics approval because it uses publicly available data from published studies. The completed review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD42024619700).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.