Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41033760›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Study protocol for a prospective diagnostic accuracy study to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of serial ankle handheld Doppler waveform assessment (Ankle HHD) for surveillance after lower-limb revascularisation: WAVE study.

Hamidah Mabruk Alodayni, Sasha Smith, Sepideh Poushpas, Kelly Swagell, Danilo Mandic, Nicholas Andrew Johnson, Usman Jaffer, Alun Davies, Pasha Normahani

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06619223 (Ankle Arterial Doppler Waveform Assessment For Surveillance Following Lower Limb Revascularisation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06619223 not yet recruitingnot on this map

Ankle Arterial Doppler Waveform Assessment For Surveillance Following Lower Limb Revascularisation

TypeobservationalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2024 to 2026Enrolled121ConditionsPeripheral Arterial DiseaseArmsDuplex Ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hamidah Mabruk AlodayniDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK Hamida.alodaini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6590-964X
Sasha SmithDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sepideh PoushpasImperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Kelly SwagellImperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Danilo MandicDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas Andrew JohnsonDepartment of Public Health, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3702-5530
Usman JafferDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alun DaviesDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5261-6913
Pasha NormahaniDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-7535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects approximately one in five people over 60 in the UK. In severe cases, revascularisation, such as surgical bypass or endovascular methods, is often required to restore limb perfusion. Between 2000 and 2019, 527 131 revascularisation procedures were carried out in the UK. Postprocedural surveillance is essential to detect restenosis and maintain vessel patency. However, standard surveillance using duplex ultrasound (DUS) is resource intensive. Ankle Doppler waveform assessment is quick, inexpensive and accurate for PAD diagnosis, yet its role in postrevascularisation surveillance remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ankle handheld Doppler waveform assessment (ankle HHD) for detecting restenosis after lower limb revascularisation, as compared with formal DUS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective diagnostic accuracy study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06619223). We aim to recruit 121 people with PAD undergoing planned lower limb revascularisation at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. Follow-up assessments will take place at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post revascularisation. At each visit, a vascular scientist will perform the index test (Ankle HHD) followed by DUS as the reference standard. A subset of participants will undergo repeat testing to assess interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Restenosis will be defined as one or more arterial lesions of ≥50% stenosis or tandem lesions with a combined value of ≥50%. The primary outcome is the sensitivity of ankle Doppler waveform assessment for detecting restenosis, compared with DUS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received approval from Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (REC reference 24/LO/0462). Results will be disseminated through research presentations and papers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06619223.

Indexed as

AnkleLower ExtremityPeripheral Arterial DiseaseUltrasonography, DopplerUltrasonography, Doppler, DuplexAnkle Brachial IndexFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesLower ExtremityULTRASONOGRAPHYUltrasoundVASCULAR SURGERY

Identifiers

PMID41033760
PMCPMC12496119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.