ArticleBMJ open2025
Glycaemic control and influencing factors among patients with post-chronic pancreatitis diabetes mellitus in China: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPost-chronic pancreatitis (CP) diabetes mellitus (PPDM-C) is a distinct form of diabetes, in which complex pathogenesis hampers adequate glycaemic control. This study aimed to identify risk factors for poor glycaemic status in PPDM-C to guide clinical management.
designCross-sectional study.
settingShanghai, China.
participantsBetween January 2018 and March 2023, 1677 patients with CP were enrolled in the CP database of the National Clinical Research Center. After application of strict exclusion criteria, 302 patients diagnosed with PPDM-C were included in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was glycaemic control. The secondary outcomes were factors that affect glycaemic control among patients with PPDM-C.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted in patients with PPDM-C. Poor glycaemic status was defined as a glycated haemoglobin A1c level of >7% at admission. Patients were stratified into those with and without diabetes treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors. The area under the curve (AUC) analysis was used to evaluate the predictive efficacy of these risk factors.
resultsA total of 302 patients with PPDM-C were analysed. Poor glycaemic status was observed in 72.6% (61/84) of patients without diabetes treatment and 52.8% (115/218) of those with diabetes treatment. For those without diabetes treatment, a history of acute pancreatitis (AP) attacks (OR: 4.838, p
conclusionsPatients with PPDM-C in China exhibited a high prevalence of poor glycaemic status. Smoking and a history of AP attacks were significantly associated with an increased risk of poor glycaemic control. The early identification of patients with PPDM-C at elevated risk of poor glycaemic control may facilitate timely and optimised management of glycaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.