ArticleParkinsonism & related disorders2025
Epigenomic profile of GBA1 in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWhile genome-wide association studies have identified GBA1 as a key gene contributing to disease severity and cognitive decline in PD, its molecular effects remain poorly understood.
methodsWe used integrative bulk ATAC-seq across six brain regions from autopsied individuals with PD and varying genetic risk to characterize region- and cell type-specific molecular differences. Using Cellformer, an AI-based bulk ATAC-seq-deconvolution tool, we determined cell type-specific effects of GBA1 on PD disease progression and then validated our findings using whole transcriptome data from blood samples.
resultsEpigenomic differences between PD with ("GBA+"; n = 15) and without ("GBA-", n = 15) GBA1 variants were localized in substantia nigra. Nineteen chromatin-accessible regions strictly separated GBA+ from GBA-, including the promoter sites of key genes such as CACNA1C, EHMT1, and SLC25A48. The effect in GBA + spanned the main cell types in brain, and chromatin differences between GBA- and GBA + increased with neuropathologic progression of disease. Significant differences in the epigenomic profile in GBA+ were observed in neuronal cells (AUROC = 0.8, AUPRC = 0.8, P-value<0.0001). Validation in blood samples distinguished between GBA+ and GBA-subtypes, achieving AUROC values of 0.99. Over 5000 transcripts in blood cells distinguished GBA+ from GBA-, validating key genes and pathways from our epigenomic analysis of brain regions.
conclusionOur study provides novel insights into the cell type-specific epigenomic and transcriptomic landscape of GBA+ and its molecular divergence from other PD subtypes, and highlights potential therapeutic targets for this genetically defined subset of PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.