ArticleBlood2025
Domain and residue mapping of autoantibodies to β2GPI reveals differences among antiphospholipid syndrome phenotypes.
Article in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cryogenic electron microscopy and coagulation factors.Current opinion in hematology · 2026Review
- βCurrent opinion in immunology · 2026Review
- In vivo targeting of open prothrombin with the monoclonal antibody POmAb results in anticoagulation without excessive bleeding.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2026Article
- Anti-β2GPI IgG display a broad reactivity against different β2GPI domains beyond domain 1: results from the APS ACTION and multi-center Italian cohorts.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractAntiphospholipid antibodies targeting β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) are a hallmark of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. Among these, antibodies targeting domain I (DI) are common in individuals at higher risk; however, their epitopes and prevalence among APS phenotypes remain unclear. Here, we use a large collection of 29 structurally and functionally validated β2GPI variants to provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of autoantibody recognition in APS. Using the prototypic human-derived monoclonal anti-DI antibody MBB2, we identified positively charged residue R39 as the key driver of MBB2 binding, followed by residues R43, N56, and T57. Structural analyses revealed that although R39 is solvent exposed, R43 is not, because it is caged by residues N56 and T57. The narrow epitope footprint explains why MBB2 exhibits a modest affinity for soluble β2GPI. The cage structure accounts for the epitope being conformational rather than linear. Mutational analyses of immunoglobulin G anti-β2GPI antibodies from 52 patients with triple-positive APS, 37 with a history of thrombosis and 15 nonvascular obstetric patients, confirmed significant reactivity against DI and showed signatures of 2 conformational epitopes: one similar to MBB2 (epitope I), in which the presence of R39 is essential, and another that does not require R39 (epitope II). Although less frequent than epitope II in our cohort, epitope I reactivity was notably enriched in patients with vascular-obstetric APS. Varying epitope specificities for DI may therefore aid in identifying different APS phenotypes and predicting clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.