Trial reportJMIR formative research2025
The Impact of Dose in an mHealth Intervention to Support Parents and Carers Via Healthy Beginnings for Hunter New England Kids Program: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of Digital Health Interventions on Breastfeeding Rates, Self-Efficacy, and Knowledge: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Digital Interventions Targeting Parents to Improve Early Childhood Movement, Nutrition, and Sleep Behaviors: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring Women's Perspectives on Receiving AI-Enabled Digital Support for Infant Feeding: Multimethods Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The dose of mobile health (mHealth) interventions can influence participant engagement, acceptability, and overall impact. However, few mHealth interventions have explored this dose-response relationship. Objective: This study aims to explore how dose influences the acceptability, engagement, cost, and impact on infant feeding status of a parent-targeted mHealth text messaging program which aims to enhance child health, including breastfeeding exclusivity and duration. Methods: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted from October 2021 to May 2024. The Healthy Beginnings for Hunter New England Kids (HB4HNEKids) program provides- text messages aimed to support parents and carers and their children by providing evidence-based preventive health information across the first 2000 days. Participants were enrolled in HB4HNEKids from 5 Child and Family Health Services in the Hunter New England region of New South Wales, Australia, and randomized into either a high-dose or low-dose text message group for the first 2 years of the pilot program. Dose refers to the quantity and frequency of text messages sent to participants. Participants in the high-dose text message group received an average of 111-121 text messages, and the low-dose text message group received 80-82 text messages across the 2 years. Outcomes of interest included acceptability, engagement, cost, and infant feeding status in relation to dose. Engagement with the messages was determined using click rates and program opt-out rates. Participant acceptability was assessed via a brief survey. Impact on infant feeding status (ie, breastfeeding, formula feeding, or mixed feeding) was determined by participants reporting their feeding status at several time points across the program. Cost was determined by assessing the per participant and total cost of sending text messages for each dose group across the 2-year period. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in click rates between high or low-dose text message groups. In the first 6 months, significantly more participants opted out of the high-dose text message group (191/2724; 7%) compared to the low-dose (108/2812; 3.8%; P<.001). In terms of program acceptability, 183 out of 214 (85.5%) participants of the high-dose and 228 out of 252 (90.5%) participants of the low-dose text message group were satisfied with the frequency of text messages. In addition, 188 out of 215 (87%) participants of high-dose and 220 out of 255 (86%) participants of low-dose text message group indicated they would recommend the program to other caregivers. The average per participant and total cost to the health service for sending messages was lower in the low-dose group (A$9.32 per participant and A$15,271.48 total; A$1 is approximately equal to US $0.68) compared to the high-dose text message group (A$12.96 per participant and A$21,241.44 total). Conclusions: The HB4HNEKids program demonstrated positive outcomes including high acceptability across both groups and no impact on infant feeding status, irrespective of dose. Given the higher opt-out rates and message costs in the high-dose text message group, a lower dose is likely more scalable for future use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.