ArticleScience progress
Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe cardiotoxic poisoning: Analysis of a cohort over 10 years.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Persistent electrical storm following strong acid descaling agent ingestion successfully rescued with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to identify early risk factors of circulatory assistance by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) on admission to intensive care unit (ICU) in population with severe cardiotoxic poisoning and to compare group characteristics with and without assistance.MethodAll patients included had severe clinical cardiotoxic poisoning, defined by hemodynamic failure requiring treatment with one or more catecholamines, in order to identify factors for circulatory assistance by multivariable logistic regression using bootstrap and supervised hierarchical classifiers methods. This single-center and retrospective study was carried out over 10 years from January 2012 to February 2022. We excluded all the patients with benign poisoning.ResultsOne-hundred forty-six cases were enrolled, including 24 with VA-ECMO (16.4%) and 122 with conventional treatment (83.6%). In circulatory support group, mortality, pneumoniae rate, intensive care length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation were higher than conventional treatment group. Predictive factors for VA-ECMO on admission were mean arterial pressure ≤ 60 mmHg, lactatemia > 4.1 mmol/L and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 20%. The estimation of the classification and regression tree analysis was 91.1%.ConclusionsPatients admitted for severe cardiotoxic poisoning presenting with hypotension, hyperlactatemia, and left ventricular dysfunction were more frequently treated with extracorporeal life support, consistent with clinical severity. Early identification of such high-risk profiles is essential to prioritize timely referral to expert centers for optimal management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.