ArticlePloS one2025
Ecological suitability evaluation of traditional village locations in Jiangxi Province based on multi-model integration using artificial intelligence.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional villages have evolved over time to adapt to their environmental characteristics, demonstrating high ecological suitability. Ideal village locations not only provide comfortable living spaces but also ensure safety and sustainability, reflecting the ancestors' profound understanding of the natural environment and ecological wisdom. This study employs an artificial intelligence-based multi-model integration approach to evaluate the ecological suitability of 413 traditional village sites in Jiangxi Province. Key influencing factors are identified, and the ecological wisdom of ancestral site selection is analyzed, resulting in an ecological suitability evaluation map for traditional village locations in Jiangxi Province. The study draws upon environmental characteristic data of Jiangxi Province, including topography, climate, habitat quality, land use, air quality, vegetation cover, and river network density. GIS technology is utilized for spatial analysis and result visualization, with raster data being extracted and standardized. Machine learning methods, such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Gradient Boosting Decision Trees, along with deep learning methods like Convolutional Neural Networks and Multilayer Perceptrons, are applied. Multi-model integration techniques combine diverse predictive outputs, thereby enhancing the overall accuracy and robustness of ecological suitability evaluations. Experimental results indicate that elevation, slope, habitat quality, actual distance to water bodies, and average temperature are the main influencing factors for village site selection. The multi-model integration method performs excellently in evaluating ecological suitability, effectively identifying key ecological factors. The model's accuracy and reliability are verified through confusion matrix, feature importance analysis, and ROC curve. By analyzing the impact weights of various ecological factors, this study constructs a Composite Suitability Index (CSI) and generates an ecological suitability evaluation map that clearly displays suitability levels. This provides a scientific basis for the protection and rational development of traditional villages and serves as a reference for ecological site selection studies in other regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.