ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, testing, and treatment of anaemia in pregnant women: A qualitative evidence synthesis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anaemia during pregnancy is a serious public health problem, inequitably burdening women in low-and middle-income countries. Despite numerous strategies and programs, anaemia prevalence rates have stagnated. We aimed to explore women's, health workers', and other key stakeholders' perceptions of anaemia in pregnant women, or their experiences with its prevention, testing, or treatment. We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, and CINAHL from inception to 12 November 2024, with no language or geographical restrictions. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis, and confidence in each review finding was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We included 61 papers from 23 countries. We grouped 25 review findings under four themes: (a) socio-cultural context of anaemia in pregnant women; (b) prevention and/or treatment of anaemia in pregnant women through diet, supplementation, or clinical intervention; (c) testing pregnant women for anaemia; and (d) factors affecting health workers' engagement in the management of anaemia in pregnant women. Women's management of anaemia in pregnancy was affected by the socio-cultural context, particularly their limited decision-making power and social position. Many women perceived a nutritious diet as integral to managing anaemia; however, high cost was often a barrier. Reasons women did not adhere to supplements included side-effects and difficulty remembering to take them, with family support improving adherence. Blood transfusion was perceived as treatment for severe anaemia, while intravenous iron was considered for women with iron-deficiency anaemia who were unable to take supplements, attended antenatal care late, or could not receive a transfusion. Health workers described difficulties testing pregnant women for anaemia and structural health-system deficiencies that affected their engagement. Findings may inform future WHO recommendations for managing anaemia in pregnant women. Future research could use review findings alongside implementation science frameworks to develop strategies for improving prevention, testing, and/or treatment of anaemia in pregnant women.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.