ArticleRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2025
[New reconstructive technique for massive zone 2+1 pelvic defects after oncological resection]
Article in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reconstruction after internal hemipelvectomy of the acetabular dome is complex, especially in young patients. At our institution, we have developed a technique that uses a proximal tibial allograft to recreate the acetabulum without compromising the proximal femur. Materials and Methods: Three patients with primary bone sarcoma of the pelvis in Zone 2+1 underwent limb-sparing surgery and reconstruction with proximal tibial allograft. Results: All patients were minors, with a follow-up of 42 months. Two patients were discharged in the second week and one in the fourth week, achieving satisfactory reconstruction allowing assisted ambulation and full weight bearing in two cases. There were two acute and one chronic infection-related complications. Discussion: Pelvic sarcomas have a worse prognosis than long bone sarcomas and require massive resections. The tibial allograft reconstruction technique improves function and satisfaction without compromising the proximal femur. This technique is feasible in low-income countries and allows for future primary arthroplasty. Conclusion: We present a successful pelvic reconstruction technique that does not affect growth in young patients, avoiding the use of prostheses and preserving the proximal femur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.