ArticleRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2025
Primary empty sella
Article in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary empty sella (PES) consists of herniation of the suprasellar subarachnoid space within the sella turcica in patients with no history of sellar pathology. Diagnosis is mostly made incidentally. Objective: Describe the characteristics of patients with PES. Methods: Patients with PES from 6 Argentine centers specialized in Neuroendocrinology in Buenos Aires diagnosed between 1997-2021 were included. Diagnosis was based in sellar magnetic resonance, pituitary functional evaluation by baseline hormonal measurement and visual function assessed by neuro-ophthalmological evaluation and campimetry. Results: Sixty-three patients with a mean age of 52.3 ± 13.2 years and a predominance of female gender (79%, 4:1 ratio) were included. The average BMI was 32.7 ± 8.13 kg/m2 and 68% were overweight or obese. HTA was also found in 59%. Among women, the parity frequency was 78%: 92% had multiple pregnancies. The diagnosis was incidental in 22%. In symptomatic patients (n= 49), the reasons for consultation were headache in 61%, symptoms of endocrine dysfunction in 51% and visual disturbances in 33%: 43% of the patients presented multiple symptoms. MRI showed partial PES in 63% and total PES in 37% of the patients. In the biochemical evaluation, hypopituitarism was observed in 46%. Conclusions: Although the diagnosis of PES can be made incidentally, in our series most of the patients presented symptoms. Most of them were multiparous women, obese and hypertensive patients. Biochemical evaluation should be carried out to investigate isolated or multiple pituitary deficits in order to indicate the corresponding replacement treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.