Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41032322›Full record

Trial reportJAMA psychiatry2025

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback for Substance Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

David Eddie, Marina Nguyen, Katherine Zeng, Sara Mei, Noah Emery

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05454657 (A Pilot Study of Ambulatory Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback for Substance Use Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05454657 nacompletednot on this map

A Pilot Study of Ambulatory Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback for Substance Use Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsSubstance Use DisordersArmsHeart rate variability biofeedback + treatment as usual, Treatment as usual only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David EddieRecovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Marina NguyenRecovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Katherine ZengRecovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Sara MeiDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
Noah EmeryDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.

Funding

Bringing real-time stress detection to scale: Development of a biosensor driven, stress detection classifier for smartwatchesK23AA027577 · NIAAA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDDIE, DAVID · 2020 to 2024
$919k
A pilot study of ambulatory Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback for substance use disorderR21DA056468 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDDIE, DAVID · 2022 to 2023
$534k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA027577NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA056468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Preliminary studies suggest heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) may reduce craving and negative affect in individuals with substance use disorder (SUD), but few studies have evaluated whether this translates into improved substance use outcomes, and no prior studies have examined second-generation wearable HRVB technology in this context. Objective: To evaluate the effects of second-generation HRVB on negative affect, positive affect, craving, and alcohol and other drug (AOD) use in adults with SUD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2 randomized clinical trial included 8 weeks of outpatient treatment. Recruitment was conducted virtually across the US from February 2023 to June 2024. Treatment-seeking adults with SUD were randomized to receive HRVB + treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU only. Intervention: Eight weeks of HRVB. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were negative affect, positive affect, craving, and substance use, assessed with ecological momentary assessment. Results: Of 260 individuals assessed for eligibility, 120 were randomized to receive HRVB + TAU or TAU only. Among study participants (69 female participants of 115 [60.0%]; mean [SD] age, 46.18 [11.59] years), HRVB was associated with significant reductions in negative affect (b, -0.01; z, -3.21; P = .001) and craving (b, -0.01; z, -4.60; P < .001) over 8 weeks. In contrast, the control group experienced increases in both negative affect and craving. No differences were observed for positive affect. HRVB was also associated with a significantly lower proportion of AOD use days (odds ratio [OR], 0.36; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.25-0.54), representing a 64% reduction in AOD use compared to controls. Treatment condition moderated the within-person relationship between craving and later AOD use (OR, 0.84; 95% CrI, 0.73-0.97), such that those receiving HRVB were less likely to use AOD following craving (b, -0.18; 95% CrI, -0.32 to -0.03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, findings suggest second-generation HRVB can reduce negative affect, craving, and substance use among individuals in early recovery from SUD. HRVB appears to confer benefit in part by disrupting the association between craving and subsequent AOD use; these results support HRVB as a potentially efficacious treatment for SUD and warrant further investigation in phase 3 trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05454657.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyHeart RateSubstance-Related DisordersAdultAffectCravingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWearable Electronic Devices

Identifiers

PMID41032322
PMCPMC12489796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.