ArticleMycotoxin research2025
Determination of ochratoxin A in meat, meat products, and edible offal by HPLC-a method validation through a collaborative trial.
Article in Mycotoxin research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a mycotoxin that can contaminate a wide range of food products as a result of fungal growth on agricultural commodities or microbial activity during the curing or maturation process of meat-based products. This paper presents a fully validated interlaboratory study involving twenty laboratories to determine OTA in pork-derived meat, meat products, and edible offal. The analytical method employed extraction with solvent, immunoaffinity columns (IAC) clean-up, and reversed-phase liquid chromatographic detection coupled with a fluorescence detector. The method demonstrated its capability to determine OTA in all tested food matrices within the range of 0.5-10 μg/kg, achieving satisfactory trueness and precision consistent with the performance criteria established in Regulation (EU) 2023/2782. Average recoveries ranged from 72 to 86%, while relative standard deviations for repeatability and reproducibility ranged from 4.2 to 11.0% and from 9.5 to 22.6%, respectively. Repeatability and reproducibility limits ranged from 0.07 to 1.36 μg/kg and from 0.20 to 4.91 μg/kg, respectively. HorRat ratios obtained ranged from 0.4 to 0.9. The availability of reliable analytical methods is crucial for activities of official control purposes. The study confirms the method's suitability for routine use in official control laboratories, providing a robust and reliable tool for OTA monitoring in pork-based products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41032241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.