ReviewPharmaceutical medicine2025
The Utility of Tissue-Agnostic Drugs in Lung Cancer Treatment.
Review in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue-agnostic therapies, which target molecular alterations across cancer types, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2017. These approvals were based on clinical trials enrolling patients across diverse tumor types, regardless of the tumor's site of origin. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved tissue-agnostic therapies in patients with lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, harboring targetable genetic alterations. Current evidence suggests that these therapies show promise in treating NTRK gene fusions (larotrectinib, entrectinib, repotrectinib), BRAF V600E mutation (dabrafenib and trametinib), and RET fusions (selpercatinib) in lung cancer. Reported rates of grade 3 or higher treatment-related or treatment-emergent adverse events ranged from 10 to 59.7%. However, available data are limited by small sample sizes (ranging from 4 to 247 participants per trial-cohort) and the absence of control groups. Larger, controlled studies and real-world evaluations are needed to confirm these findings and inform broader clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.