Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41032236›Full record

ReviewJournal of echocardiography2025

Indication and timing in tricuspid interventions.

Atsushi Sugiura, Georg Nickenig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of echocardiography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Atsushi SugiuraDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Sunadabashi 1-1-14, Nagoya, 461-0045, Japan. sssugi@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6836-8536
Georg NickenigDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR), previously considered a secondary valvular disorder with limited clinical implications, is now recognized as a progressive and prognostically significant disease. The increasing prevalence due to aging populations and common comorbidities, such as atrial fibrillation and heart failure, has underscored the clinical urgency of addressing TR effectively. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) have emerged as valuable therapeutic alternatives, especially for patients at high surgical risk. This review addresses critical clinical questions regarding optimal intervention timing, patient selection, and treatment strategies, focusing particularly on disease progression, right-ventricular (RV) function, and recent clinical evidence. It emphasizes the importance of early identification and monitoring through echocardiographic and laboratory parameters, comprehensive risk stratification including pulmonary hypertension assessment, and the practical use of predictive tools such as TRISCORE. We summarize current guidelines for surgical versus transcatheter interventions and discuss advancements and limitations of transcatheter therapies, particularly transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR). Ultimately, individualized decision-making based on anatomical considerations, RV function, and comorbidity burden is vital to maximizing therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationTricuspid ValveTricuspid Valve InsufficiencyHumansPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID41032236
PMCPMC12630165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.