Trial reportNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Long-term real-world effectiveness and safety of fremanezumab in 1140 patients with migraine and at least 6 months of treatment: third interim analysis of the pan-European PEARL study.
Trial report in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP): Biology, Signaling, Pathophysiological Roles, and Therapeutic Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Migraine, monoclonal antibodies, and monitoring: a review of pharmacovigilance in the era of biologics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionReal-world data on the long-term use of fremanezumab for migraine prevention remain limited. This third interim analysis of the PEARL study addresses this gap by investigating the long-term effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of fremanezumab for up to 12 months of treatment.
methodsPEARL is a 24-month, prospective, observational, Phase 4 study conducted in 11 European countries. Eligible participants were adults (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with chronic or episodic migraine who received subcutaneous fremanezumab (225 mg monthly or 675 mg quarterly) and completed ≥ 6 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of participants achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) during the 6-month period following treatment initiation. Secondary endpoints included mean change from baseline to Month 12 in: average MMD, acute migraine medication use, and migraine-related disability scores, as measured by the Migraine Disability Assessment and the 6-item Headache Impact Test. Safety was assessed through the collection of adverse events.
resultsAt data cut-off (22 September 2022), 968 of 1140 enrolled participants were included in the effectiveness analysis with 58.5% achieving the primary endpoint. Sustained reductions in MMD, acute medication use, and disability scores were observed over 12 months, and no new safety signals were detected.
conclusionsFindings from this third interim analysis of PEARL provide compelling evidence for the long-term effectiveness of fremanezumab in a large, real-world patient population. The results support the continued use of fremanezumab as a preventive strategy for migraine and underscore the value of integrating real-world evidence into migraine management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUPAS35111.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.