ArticleOral radiology2026
Clinical factors associated with jawbone remineralization after nonsurgical treatment and imaging-based insights into its processes.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to clarify the clinical factors and processes associated with jawbone remineralization at sites of tumor-induced bone destruction after nonsurgical treatment by analyzing clinical factors, computed tomography (CT) values, and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT images.
methodsThe data of 58 patients with jawbone destruction due to oral tumors or metastatic lesions who received radiation therapy or chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical factors, treatment modalities, and CT and PET/CT images at the time of bone destruction and remineralization were analyzed. CT values were measured at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, and the ratios to the reference values were calculated.
resultsAmong the 58 patients studied, 23 had remineralization, 25 showed no significant changes, and 10 had progressive bone resorption. Significant factors influencing remineralization included age, tumor histology, site of jawbone destruction, type of bone destruction, and radiation dose. The mean CT values at the remineralized sites increased progressively, and significant age- and sex-related differences were observed at 12 months. Patients younger than 18 years had CT values and bone-morphology changes comparable to reference sites. Post-treatment PET/CT revealed significant
conclusionsBone remineralization following jawbone destruction is influenced by patient-specific characteristics and treatment-related factors. Changes in CT values during bone remineralization and metabolic activity detected using PET/CT provide insights into the underlying processes of bone remineralization.
trial registrationRegistration number: E2023-0253. Registration date: February 19, 2024 (Hiroshima University Epidemiological Research Ethics Committee).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.