ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Food supplements in the context of social media: results from a survey on use and perceptions in Germany].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, food supplements such as vitamin or mineral preparations have gained great popularity. This is also evident on social media where influencers in particular disseminate information about or advertise food supplements. This way, consumers may get a one-sided impression of food supplements. As the intake of food supplements is associated with specific health risks and benefits, target group-specific education is necessary. The foundation for this is knowledge of perceptions and use of food supplements in the population.
methodsA representative (for age, gender, education and federal state) online survey (n = 1071) was conducted in September 2024 to investigate usage behaviour, intake motivation, and perceptions with regard to food supplements in Germany.
resultsOf the respondents, 76.6% reported having taken food supplements during the past year, particularly specific micronutrients such as magnesium or vitamin D. The main reasons for their usage were health-related. In addition, 14.3% of consumers considered food supplements as food in accordance with the legal definition. There were differences in usage behaviour, intake motivation and perception of food supplements depending on whether or not respondents had perceived information about food supplements on social media. Persons who had received information about food supplements on social media took a greater number of different substances, were more likely to take food supplements at least once a week and rated their benefit higher. DISCUSSION: The findings reveal both implications for health and risk communication and the need for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.