Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41032133›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[Food supplements in the context of social media: results from a survey on use and perceptions in Germany].

Henri Obstfeld, Mark Lohmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Henri ObstfeldAbteilung Risikokommunikation, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Deutschland. Henri.Obstfeld@bfr.bund.de.
Mark LohmannAbteilung Risikokommunikation, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, food supplements such as vitamin or mineral preparations have gained great popularity. This is also evident on social media where influencers in particular disseminate information about or advertise food supplements. This way, consumers may get a one-sided impression of food supplements. As the intake of food supplements is associated with specific health risks and benefits, target group-specific education is necessary. The foundation for this is knowledge of perceptions and use of food supplements in the population.

methodsA representative (for age, gender, education and federal state) online survey (n = 1071) was conducted in September 2024 to investigate usage behaviour, intake motivation, and perceptions with regard to food supplements in Germany.

resultsOf the respondents, 76.6% reported having taken food supplements during the past year, particularly specific micronutrients such as magnesium or vitamin D. The main reasons for their usage were health-related. In addition, 14.3% of consumers considered food supplements as food in accordance with the legal definition. There were differences in usage behaviour, intake motivation and perception of food supplements depending on whether or not respondents had perceived information about food supplements on social media. Persons who had received information about food supplements on social media took a greater number of different substances, were more likely to take food supplements at least once a week and rated their benefit higher. DISCUSSION: The findings reveal both implications for health and risk communication and the need for further research.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSocial MediaAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultInformation behaviourMicronutrientsMotivationRisk communicationRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID41032133
PMCPMC12583333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.