ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Bone regeneration therapy using low level laser treatment in a rabbit model: pilot study.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of using diode laser on bone wound healing in rabbit calvarial models. A sample of 14 rabbits was used in this study. Bony osteotomies, 5 mm in diameter with half-thickness in the calvaria of each rabbit, were created. The study cohort was divided equally into two groups based on the postoperative observation period of either 2 or 4 weeks. The control group (Group A) received no laser treatment. Groups B, C, and D were laser treated for periods of 15, 30, and 45 s, respectively. Defect sites were assessed using microcomputed tomography. Histology was used to evaluate tissue response. Descriptive and non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted to compare bone structural outcomes across control and laser-treated groups at 2- and 4-week time points. Group differences were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Bone structural outcomes were comparable across groups at both 2 and 4 weeks, with no significant differences except for higher histomorphometry values in the laser-treated group at 4 weeks (p = 0.030). Over time, significant improvements in bone fraction and histomorphometry, and a reduction in connectivity density, were observed, particularly in laser-treated groups. Histological analysis revealed enhanced bone formation and more mature bone architecture in laser-treated groups compared to controls. The micro-CT and histological data suggest the potential for enhanced bone formation across all treatment groups. Additionally, no signs of adverse effects were observed in any of the laser-treated groups, supporting the safety of the applied protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41032127What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.