Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41032119›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2025

Comment on "Independent risk factors and survival prediction in hip refractures patients: insights from a 10-year cohort".

Caroline Francis, Gujar Anantkumar Jotiram, Inamul Hasan Madar

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caroline FrancisTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Gujar Anantkumar JotiramJaywant College of Engineering and Polytechnic, Kille Machhindragad, Tal Walwa, District Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
Inamul Hasan MadarCentre for Integrative Omics Data Science, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, 575018, India. inamulhasan.ciods@yenepoya.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qi et al. presented a prognostic model for hip refracture survival, identifying age, comorbidities, lymphocyte count, and surgery as key predictors. Although clinically relevant, the model lacks external validation and uses suboptimal predictor handling. The selection bias and underpowered subgroup analysis limit the generalizability of the results. Further robust multicenter studies are needed to refine risk stratification in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

ComorbiditiesHip refractureLymphocyte countPrognostic modelSurvival prediction

Identifiers

PMID41032119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.