ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2026
Emergency obstructed hernia admissions over the COVID-19 national lockdowns: a regional review.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEmergency obstructed hernias pose a significant clinical challenge and can lead to higher complication rates, prolonged recovery, bowel resection and recurrence. Early diagnosis, urgent surgical intervention and appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis are key. Our study aimed to describe the impact of national lockdowns on emergency obstructed hernia admissions and the effect on patient demographics and compliance with recommendation rates. Should another lockdown be in place in the future this could help us prepare plans for appropriate care and service provision.
methodsPatient records for those who received emergency surgery on obstructed hernias at a single site during the three COVID-19 lockdown periods in England were reviewed and underwent thematic analysis. A temporal comparison was undertaken, and 105 patients met the inclusion criteria.
resultsThere were no significant differences in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and length of stay. The mean duration of symptoms was 1,307 ± 1,779 days in the lockdown group vs 215 ± 593 days in the control group (
conclusionsThis study suggests that more patients presented in obstruction and as an emergency with long-standing hernias during the COVID-19 lockdown. We recommend enacting adequate postoperative follow-up to reduce higher rates of re-admission, and better patient education or discussions with primary care to ensure adequate forward referrals of hernias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.