ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2025
Skinspan
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Histidine Derivatives-From Basic Research to Potential Applications in Cosmetics and Nutricosmetics.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dermal Fibroblast Senescence: The Central Hub of Skin Aging-From Intrinsic Dysfunction to Microenvironmental Remodeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Skin microbiome and cutaneous aging mechanisms and clinical implications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin aging is an inherent biological component of human aging. As the global population ages, the incidence of age-related skin conditions has become increasingly prevalent. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, collectively known as the skin "exposome," contribute to visible and physiological changes. The skin's layers, including the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis, function both independently and interdependently in these aging processes. Intrinsic factors such as hormonal fluctuations, genetic predispositions, and cellular senescence, defined as an irreversible cell cycle arrest, drive physiological age-related skin changes. These changes are underpinned by several interconnected hallmarks of aging, including genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, and loss of proteostasis, all of which impair cell renewal and dermal structure. Stem cell exhaustion and mitochondrial dysfunction reduce the skin's capacity to regenerate and adapt to stress, whereas altered intercellular communication and chronic low-grade inflammation ("inflammaging") further accelerate aging phenotypes such as loss of elasticity, epidermal thinning, and delayed wound healing. Extrinsic factors, including ultraviolet radiation, air pollution, smoking, and poor nutrition, compound these effects by increasing oxidative stress, DNA damage, and activating senescence-associated secretory phenotypes. Lifelong sun protection, nutritious dietary habits, regular physical activity, and topical interventions such as sunscreen and moisturizers help maintain a resilient skin microenvironment. This review highlights the urgent need to recognize, prevent, and treat skin aging. Emerging therapies targeting root-cause mechanisms may revolutionize dermatologic care and extend skin healthspan - now known as skinspan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.