Trial reportThe Journal of clinical investigation2025
Circadian rhythmicity and biopsychosocial characteristics influence opioid use in chronic low back pain.
Trial report in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Shedding light on pain management: a translational systematic review of light therapy for the treatment of chronic pain.EBioMedicine · 2026Pooled it
- Nociceptor circadian clock genes control excitability and pain perception in mice in a sex- and time-dependent manner.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDInter- and intraindividual fluctuations in pain intensity pose a major challenge to treatment efficacy, with a majority of people perceiving their pain relief as inadequate. Recent preclinical studies have identified circadian rhythmicity as a potential contributor to these fluctuations and a therapeutic target.METHODSWe therefore sought to determine the impact of circadian rhythms in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) through a detailed characterization, including questionnaires to evaluate biopsychosocial characteristics, ecological momentary assessment (7 day e-diaries at 8:00/14:00/20:00) to observe pain fluctuations, and intraday blood transcriptomics (at 8:00/20:00) to identify genes/pathways of interest.RESULTSWhile most individuals displayed constant or variable/mixed pain phenotypes, a distinct subset had daily fluctuations of increasing pain scores (>30% change in intensity over 12 hours in ≥4/7 days). This population had no opioid users, better biopsychosocial profiles, and differentially expressed transcripts relative to other pain phenotypes. The circadian-governed neutrophil degranulation pathway was particularly enriched among arrhythmic individuals; the link between neutrophil degranulation and opioid use was further confirmed in a separate CLBP cohort.CONCLUSIONOur findings identified pain rhythmicity and the circadian expression of neutrophil degranulation pathways as indicators of CLBP outcomes, which may help provide a personalized approach to phenotyping biopsychosocial characteristics and medication use. This highlights the need to better understand the impact of circadian rhythmicity across chronic pain conditions.FUNDINGThis work was funded by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; grant PJT-190170, to NG and MGP) and the CIHR-Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Chronic Pain Network (grant SCA-145102, to NG, QD, LD, MGP, and MC). DT was funded by a MS Canada endMS Doctoral Research Award, AMZ by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship, HGMG by a CIHR Doctoral Research Award, MGP by a Junior 2 Research Scholarship from the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé, and LD by a Canadian Excellence Research Chairs and Pfizer Canada Professorship in Pain Research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.