ArticleResearch in psychotherapy (Milano)2025
Research in psychoanalysis across theory and practice: a systematic literature review.
Article in Research in psychotherapy (Milano), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ecologies of care: qualitative insights from a psychosocial study on veterinarians' experiences in Northeastern Italy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present systematic review of the literature aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the state of the art of research in psychoanalysis. The arguments draw a difference between psychoanalytic research and research in psychoanalysis, meaning that in the past decades, there has been an attempt to bridge the gaps between psychoanalysis and broader research in psychology. Major scientific databases for contemporary psychological research (Ebsco PsycINFO, Ebsco CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PEP-Web) were searched to gather psychoanalytic-oriented research, both theoretical and empirical. The PRIMA method provided a total of 36 results, on which a conceptual/reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. The identified themes or dimensions are: i) the epistemological status of psychoanalysis; ii) the research domains in psychoanalysis; iii) the research methodology in psychoanalysis; iv) the research methods in psychoanalysis; and v) the instruments of research in psychoanalysis. We conclude that, despite long-lasting difficulties in the epistemological cohabitation between psychoanalysis and mainstream psychological research, new hybrid ways for future psychoanalysis can be identified.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.