ArticleCancer medicine2025
Treatment-Related Adverse Events and Associated Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Enfortumab Vedotin: Analysis of the UNITE Study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxicity attribution during enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab therapy in urothelial carcinoma: a practical framework.The oncologist · 2026Review
- Review
- Enfortumab vedotin-induced cutaneous toxicities and their association with survival in urothelial carcinoma.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Pharmacotherapeutic Properties and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Oncology: Principles, Clinical Development, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Novel Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor and Antibody-Drug Conjugate Approaches in the Perioperative Management of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Treatment-Related Adverse Events and Associated Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Enfortumab Vedotin: Analysis of the UNITE Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEnfortumab vedotin-ejfv (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate approved for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), has limited real-world safety data and no validated predictive biomarkers. Retrospective studies suggest higher objective response rates (ORR) among patients developing EV-related dermatologic toxicities, but survival implications remain unclear. This analysis assessed the safety of EV monotherapy and the impact of dermatologic and neurologic toxicities on efficacy outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort. MATERIALS AND
methodsUNITE is a multicenter, retrospective study across 16 US sites of patients with aUC treated with targeted agents, including EV. Primary endpoints were the incidence of EV treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, any grade) and TRAE-related treatment modifications. Secondary endpoints included a comparison of ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without dermatologic toxicities and neuropathy. To reduce immortal time bias, Cox regression models incorporated TRAEs as time-dependent covariates to adjust for EV treatment duration as well as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), hemoglobin, and liver metastases.
resultsBetween 2018 and 2023, 485 patients with aUC received > 1 dose of EV monotherapy. Most (67%) received > 2 prior therapy lines. Any grade TRAEs occurred in 77%, most frequently neuropathy (36%) and dermatologic toxicities (27%); 57% required treatment modification and 21% discontinued EV, primarily due to neuropathy (9%) and fatigue (3%). Patients with dermatologic toxicities and neuropathy had higher ORR (56% vs. 42%; p = 0.007 and 64% vs. 35%; p < 0.0001, respectively). Neuropathy was independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.50-0.87; p = 0.002); dermatologic TRAEs were not associated with PFS or OS benefit.
conclusionsEV safety outside clinical trials was consistent with prior reports, with no new signals. Treatment modifications were most often due to neuropathy, dermatologic toxicities, and fatigue. Both dermatologic toxicities and neuropathy correlated with higher ORR, but only neuropathy was independently associated with improved OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.