ArticleEFORT open reviews2025
The dynamic reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament shows good subjective outcomes but high rates of recurrent instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction vs Nonoperative Treatment for Recurrent Lateral Patellar Dislocation: Three-Year Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.The American journal of sports medicine · 2026Trial
- Poor Prognostic Factors in Surgically Treated Habitual Patellar Dislocation in Children and Adolescents.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The surgical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is a commonly used treatment for recurrent patellar dislocations. A surgical method which is frequently used is the dynamic reconstruction of the MPFL (dMPFLr), which involves attaching the released end of a hamstring muscle to the medial patella using a pulley. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the evidence of this method in terms of patient-reported outcomes, the rate of recurrent instabilities, and other complications. Methods: MEDLINE® and Web of Science™ were used to identify eligible studies. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled rates of the Kujala scores, rates of recurrent instabilities, and complication rates. Results: A total of 1,087 studies were screened for eligibility. Six studies, comprising a total of 267 treated knees, met the inclusion criteria and were included. All the publications included were retrospective analyses (level of evidence III). The random-effects model showed an overall mean postoperative Kujala score of 86.74 (95% CI: 79.37-94.11; heterogeneity: I 2 = 94%), a recurrent instability rate of 13% (95% CI: 9-18%; heterogeneity: I 2 = 0%), and additional complications mentioned at a rate of 9% (95% CI: 5-16%; heterogeneity: I 2 = 0%). Conclusion: Although good results are achieved with regard to the patient-reported outcomes and complication rates, there is a high rate of recurrent instabilities. Despite these results, dMPFLr can be considered an option for the treatment of skeletally immature patients, as it avoids the need for intraoperative fluoroscopy and the risk of epiphyseal joint injury due to femoral fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.