ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
Machine Learning-Based Dizziness/Vertigo Disease Diagnosis by Combining Medical History and Signs.
Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Review of Nystagmus and Vertigo Diagnostics: From Pathological Foundations to AI-Driven Telemedicine.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Improving the Diagnostic Workup of Vertigo: A Multidisciplinary Review.Spartan medical research journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ImportanceClinicians face great challenges in diagnosing dizziness/vertigo disease due to its subjectivity. Currently, there is an absence of machine learning model that could make full use of the information gained from both medical history and physical signs.ObjectiveTo develop and validate a machine learning model based on medical history and physical signs for dizziness/vertigo disease diagnosis, relieving the burden of diagnosis for clinicians.DesignA retrospective cohort study.SettingTertiary referral center.ParticipantsThis study included 1003 patients conformed to the inclusion criteria at the neuro-otologists' clinics.ExposuresThirty-one medical history items, and 9 bedside examination signs recorded by routinely performing a detailed ocular motor examination using video goggles.Main Outcome MeasuresThe accuracy, precision, recall, F1 scores, and Matthews' correlation coefficient of disease diagnosis.ResultsOn the collected dataset of 16 categories of dizziness/vertigo diseases, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 98.11% and an F1 score of 95.43%. The model demonstrated its optimal robustness when tested with datasets containing added noise. Additionally, an analysis of the correlation between medical history and signs was conducted, along with several case studies.ConclusionsA machine learning-based model was proposed for the diagnosis of dizziness/vertigo, which effectively combined patients' medical history and signs. In terms of diagnostic accuracy, it outperforms models that rely solely on either medical history or signs for diagnosis.RelevanceThe proposed method can effectively combine the patient's medical history and physical sign information to make the diagnosis of dizziness/vertigo disease, which has the potential to relieve the burden of diagnosis for clinicians to a certain extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.