ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
Evaluating the Efficacy of Large Language Models for Dizzy History Taking and Peripheral Vestibular Disorder Diagnosis.
Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of sleep quality and inner-ear-specific biomarkers Otolin-1 and otoconin-90 with disease severity in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Improving the Diagnostic Workup of Vertigo: A Multidisciplinary Review.Spartan medical research journal · 2025Review
- AI-based Prediction of Neck Metastasis in Early-stage Lip Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Preoperative Clinical-morphologic Features.The Journal of craniofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ImportanceVertigo accounts for one of the most frequent presenting symptoms in primary care. However, complexities in differential diagnoses and reliance on clinical history contribute to frequent specialist referrals and diagnostic delays. Large language models (LLMs), like LLaMA-3.1-8B, offer new potential for assisting in clinical decision-making.ObjectiveTo assess the utility of a small-scale, open-source LLM in diagnosing peripheral vestibular disorders (PVDs), and evaluate the impact of synthetic data augmentation on diagnostic accuracy.DesignRetrospective chart review.Setting/ParticipantsA retrospective analysis included adult patients presenting with dizziness to a neuro-otologist at St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton between 2018 and 2023. The dataset comprised 100 clinical cases, supplemented with 40 synthetic cases generated using GPT-4. The LLaMA-3.1-8B model was evaluated on the clinical, synthetic, and combined datasets. Diagnostic reasoning approaches, including chain-of-thought reasoning and multi-shot prompting, were employed to optimize model performance.Main Outcome MeasuresMetrics for evaluation included top 1 and top 3 diagnostic accuracy, Cohen's kappa for inter-rater agreement, and accuracy in predicting symptom laterality.ResultsThe LLaMA-3.1-8B model achieved a top 1 diagnostic accuracy of 60.7% and a top 3 accuracy of 71.4% in the combined dataset. The most frequent diagnosis was Meniere's disease (55.7%), followed by vestibular migraines (9.3%) and labyrinthitis (9.3%). Diagnostic accuracy was highest for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (90%), followed by Meniere's disease (80.8%). Less common conditions, such as superior canal dehiscence syndrome and vestibular paroxysmia, exhibited lower diagnostic accuracies. Cohen's kappa indicated substantial agreement for symptom side prediction (κ = 0.96) and moderate agreement for diagnosis (κ = 0.41) in the combined dataset.Conclusions and RelevanceThe LLaMA-3.1-8B model demonstrated promising accuracy in diagnosing PVDs. The model's performance highlights its potential to serve as a high-yield screening tool for primary care physicians and general otolaryngologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.