Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41031521›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

A review of the impact of micro- and nanoplastics on female reproduction: What we know and gaps in knowledge.

Sanchayana Raghuvir, Shawn Alex, Deborah Clegg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sanchayana RaghuvirTexas Tech University Health Science Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5057-7260
Shawn AlexTexas Tech University Health Science Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA.
Deborah CleggTexas Tech University Health Science Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micro-and nanoplastics (MNPs) are breakdown products of plastics, and humans are exposed to these particles through air, water, food, and soil. There is a growing concern that human exposure to MNPs negatively impacts health. In this review we will discuss the potential health impact of MNPs on ovarian function and the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis. We will highlight that the deleterious effects of MNPs on female reproductive health have been mostly documented in animal models. Studies have demonstrated that MNPs accumulate in ovarian tissue, disrupt hormonal signaling, and induce oxidative stress, leading to hormonal irregularities, ovarian atrophy, and increased androgen levels. Additionally, there is accumulating evidence that not only are MNPs a concern by themselves, but they are also carriers of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) which further exacerbate reproductive dysfunction. While animal models demonstrate reproductive toxicity from MNP exposure, there are gaps in our knowledge on whether these findings can be translated to humans. Human clinical trials to directly determine the impact of MNPs are unethical because the evidence suggests MNP exposure may be detrimental to health. In this review, we highlight gaps in our knowledge and suggest areas which need further research.

Indexed as

endocrine disruptionenvironmental exposurefertilityhypothalamic–pituitary‐ovarian (HPO) axismicroplasticsnanoplasticsovarian functionreproductive toxicity

Identifiers

PMID41031521
PMCPMC12936631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.