Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41031439›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026

Fraternal cooperation of hierarchical cancer parallels metazoan multicellularity and eusociality.

Jibeom Choi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jibeom ChoiDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, 17104, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7889-1606

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00337511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metazoan multicellularity and eusociality - both outcomes of the fraternal major transitions - have numerous features in common such as uneven distribution of group-establishing potential. In addition to this framework, I argue herein that the group-forming principles of metazoan multicellularity and eusociality are analogous to hierarchical cancer in that the cancer stem cells generate other cancer cells deprived of tumorigenicity. As such, I introduce concepts of germinating reproducers and sterile workers widely applicable to those systems. In particular, exploitative replication is suggested as an efficient strategy for maintaining the cooperation of fraternal cooperative organisations accompanied by asymmetric replication/reproduction. From this point of view, the defectors that spontaneously appear in metazoan multicellular organisms, eusocial colonies, and cancer clusters are cancers, egg-laying workers, and hypertumours, respectively. In a way similar to the policing observed in eusociality and metazoan multicellularity, I propose the hypothesis that the lactate-producing Warburg effect of cancer cells could represent a policing mechanism against hypertumours. Specifically, the Warburg effect establishes an acidified microenvironment that can repress growth of defector hypertumours by restricting diffusion of cancer growth factors. Considering the altruistic nature of the Warburg effect and metabolic plasticity, the possibility of hypertumours performing oxidative phosphorylation is discussed. This structural analogy not only highlights the role of asymmetric replication/reproduction in highly cooperative systems, but also provides a novel perspective on the social interactions of cancer cells, potentially laying foundations for clinical strategies aimed at disrupting cancer cooperation.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSocial BehaviorAnimalsHumanscancereusocialityevolutionary game theorymajor transitionmetazoan multicellularity

Identifiers

PMID41031439
PMCPMC12783436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.