Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41031377›Full record

ArticleRand health quarterly2025

Strategies for Sustaining Emergency Care in the United States.

Mahshid Abir, Brian Briscombe, Carl T Berdahl, Kirstin W Scott, Sydney Cortner, Daniel Wang, Rose Kerber, Wilson Nham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rand health quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Condition-Specific Protocols Used in the Emergency Department Observation Unit: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mahshid Abir
Brian Briscombe
Carl T Berdahl
Kirstin W Scott
Sydney Cortner
Daniel Wang
Rose Kerber
Wilson Nham

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, much has changed in the emergency care landscape in the United States. Hospital-based emergency departments (EDs) and the health care professionals who provide care in them have been at the forefront of responding to the opioid and gun violence epidemics and the coronavirus pandemic, with reported increases in patient acuity and complexity. During the same time frame, there have been unsustainable declines in payment for emergency care, putting the viability of EDs at risk. The authors (1) assess the current value of emergency care, (2) evaluate challenges to sustaining emergency care, (3) measure trends in emergency care payment, and (4) identify alternate funding strategies for emergency care. To achieve these objectives, they sought expert input in the form of a study advisory board and conducted interviews and focus groups, a survey, case studies, an environmental scan of peer-reviewed and gray literature, and analysis of administrative data. The authors find that EDs offer many types of value to various stakeholders in the United States but that, because of the stresses EDs have faced over the past decade, the viability of emergency care as we know it is at risk. The authors offer policy actions that need to be taken on multiple fronts to preserve emergency care.

Indexed as

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)Emergency Services and ResponseFee-for-Service for Health CareHealth Care ReformHospitalsMeasuring Health Care CostsMedical ProfessionalsNurses and NursingPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID41031377
PMCPMC12479005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.