ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Socioeconomic inequalities in waist circumference and its 12-year change: Moderation by neighbourhood population density.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity is a public health priority. We examined whether population density, a key environmental characteristic associated with obesity, moderates the associations of area-level socioeconomic status (SES) with waist circumference and its rate of change. Methods: Data from adults in an Australian national study, collected across three waves (1999-2000, 2005-06, 2011-12), were used. Outcomes were objectively measured baseline waist circumference ( Results: Higher area-level SES was associated with smaller baseline waist circumference (-1.45, 95 % CI [-2.28, -0.12]) but not with change over time (0.04, 95 % CI [-0.02, 0.09]). In stratified cross-sectional analyses, this association was significant in lower- (-5.00, 95 % CI -7.73, -2.28]) and medium-density (-2.61, 95 % CI [-4.55, -0.67]), but not in higher-density areas (-0.54, 95 % CI [-1.73,0.65]). In longitudinal analyses, lower SES was linked to smaller increases in waist circumference in lower- (0.16, 95 % CI [0.03, 0.29]) and medium-density (0.17, 95 % CI [0.05, 0.30]) areas, suggesting a narrowing of socioeconomic inequalities in obesity. However, annual changes were modest and unlikely to offset baseline inequalities. Conclusions: Population density moderated associations of area-level SES with waist circumference and its change. Inequalities in baseline obesity were pronounced in lower density areas but not higher density areas. While the longitudinal findings of the moderation patterns were different from baseline results, they suggest persistent socioeconomic inequalities in obesity in lower density areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.